IMF: Enemy of the People

The IMF recommendations all involve creation of more debt. In fact, as incredible as it may sound, the IMF is openly against savings. The IMF also opposes broad tax cuts or support for U.S. workers and industries. In short, the IMF is merely another propaganda arm of the global financial elite. The root falsehood, the core lie at the heart of their propaganda efforts:the false idea that money is wealth.

The false idea that money is wealth keeps the average citizen from questioning the role or authority of the banks. As those of you who are spreading the good news of the Jubilee Year know from experience, when you bring up the idea of cancelling debt, most people think it would destroy the economy. In short, their propaganda has done its work, and the average person is mentally brainwashed to support the banking agenda, even at their own expense.

WASHINGTON -- The International Monetary Fund's top economist generally endorsed the incoming Obama administration's approach to economic stimulus, and urged countries to consider offering a kind of "recession insurance" to companies and individuals. President-elect Barack Obama's economic team is weighing a stimulus plan that would cost somewhere between $675 billion and $775 billion over two years, and would be used largely for construction and other government spending. The package is likely to include a temporary tax cut of as much as $1,000 for middle-income families.

Olivier Blanchard, the IMF's chief economist, said "the size corresponds roughly to what we think is needed." He backed the Obama approach of targeted tax cuts, saying the money should go to consumers who are "truly credit constrained." In an accompanying research paper, Mr. Blanchard and three other IMF economists advised against broad cuts in corporate tax rates, dividends and capital gains -- Republican favorites -- which they judge "likely to be ineffective" because profits are low. The changes "are often difficult to reverse," they added. In an interview, Mr. Blanchard said a general tax cut may be less effective than other measures because many consumers would save the money.

IMF recommendations rarely have much clout in the U.S., but the timing of the paper and Mr. Blanchard's comments may make a difference, as the Obama team is looking to present its plans as responsible and widely acceptable. The findings pose another hurdle for Republicans. Former Bush White House economist Glenn Hubbard argues that despite the IMF findings, a broad corporate tax cut would spur investment and boost stock prices. Not all the IMF's comments supported Mr. Obama. Mr. Blanchard warned plans to bail out car companies could prompt a trade fight if other nations tried to match or exceed U.S. aid. He said countries should focus on providing credit in the case of corporate restructurings.

Mr. Blanchard, on leave from the Massachusetts Institute of Technology, has long done research with Mr. Obama's chief economic adviser, Lawrence Summers. A spokeswoman for the Obama transition office didn't comment on the IMF findings, but said "economists across the ideological spectrum agree that the danger is doing too little to get our economy moving again, not too much." The IMF has long urged China to take similar steps to boost its economy. Overall, the IMF has been campaigning for a global stimulus plan of 2% of world gross domestic product -- or more than $1 trillion.

Among the IMF's proposals is a kind of "recession insurance." Under that plan, individual governments would offer insurance to firms and individuals that would pay off if GDP sank below a certain level. "Widespread use of such [recession insurance] contracts would provide an additional automatic stabilizer because payments would be made when they are most needed, namely in bad times," the IMF paper said. With such instruments, Mr. Blanchard acknowledged, potential buyers might worry whether, during a downturn, governments would make the payouts.